In Oklahoma, the difference between “family in your heart” and “family in the law” can be devastating. A real-world case involving a father named Wiley shows exactly what happens when a “DIY” plan meets the rigid reality of Oklahoma statutes.
The Situation: A Conflicted Legacy
Wiley had three biological children—Curtis, Pam, and Janet—and a step-son, Jeffrey. Throughout his life, Wiley told his kids he wanted his assets divided equally. Some thought that this meant Jeffrey too. However, his legal paperwork told a much more complicated and contradictory story.
The “Failed Will”
After Wiley passed away, a document was found that he had signed. In this document, Wiley explicitly identified Jeffrey as his step-son and stated that Jeffrey should receive only $100, while the other children shared the rest.
The Problem: This document did not meet the strict legal requirements for a valid Will in Oklahoma. Because it wasn’t properly witnessed and didn’t qualify as a handwritten (holographic) Will, the court had to ignore it entirely.
The Legal Standing of Step-Children to Inherit
Because the “Will” failed, the estate fell into Intestacy (the state’s default plan). This created a major legal hurdle for Jeffrey:
- No Automatic Rights: Under Oklahoma law (Title 84 § 213), step-children have no legal standing to inherit if there is no valid Will. Unless a step-child has been legally adopted, the law treats them as a “legal stranger” to the estate.
- The “Moral” Division: Curtis, Pam, and Janet tried to follow what they thought were their father’s wishes. They took the money from Wiley’s bank accounts (which were POD to Curtis) and split it three ways—completely excluding Jeffrey.
The Court’s Ruling: Facts Over Feelings
Jeffrey sued, hoping the court would honor his father’s verbal promises of an equal split. But the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals ruled against him for two reasons:
- Contracts Trump Promises: Wiley had listed Curtis as the “Payable on Death” (POD) beneficiary on his accounts. The court held that this bank contract was the final word—regardless of what Wiley said in person or wrote in his failed Will.
- The Step-Child Barrier: Without a valid Will or a legal adoption, Jeffrey had no “heir” status. He could not force a distribution from a father who, in the eyes of the law, had no legal obligation to him.
Why This Matters for Your Blended Family
At Winblad Law, we see these tragedies often. If you have a blended family, you cannot rely on “the state plan” or “conversations” to protect your children.
- If you want to include a step-child: You must have a valid, legally executed Will or Trust. The law will not do it for you.
- If you want to exclude or limit an inheritance: You must do so in a way that stands up to a court challenge. Wiley’s attempt to give Jeffrey “$100” failed because he didn’t follow the rules of execution.
The Myth of the “Verbal Will”
A common misconception in Oklahoma is that a “Deathbed Wish” or a verbal instruction to family members can function as a Will. Legally, this is known as a nuncupative will, and in Oklahoma, it is almost never valid for modern estate planning.
To even be considered, a verbal will has strict limitations: the estate must be worth less than $1,000, it must be proved by two witnesses, and the person must have been in actual military service in the field or in fear of immediate death from an injury received that same day. In other words, the possibility of a verbal Will in Oklahoma is next to zero. For families like Wiley’s, a verbal promise to “divide things equally” has zero legal standing in probate court.
About Richard Winblad
In the complex world of Oklahoma estate law, details are the difference between a secure legacy and a family legal battle. Richard Winblad brings a concentrated practice in estate planning, probate, and trust law to every client he serves, ensuring that their “darts” hit the bullseye.
As an active member of the Oklahoma Bar Association’s Estate Planning, Probate, and Trust Section, Richard stays at the forefront of the statutes that govern how assets transition from one generation to the next. His commitment to legal excellence earned him the “Award of Excellence” for his contributions to the professional handbook for Medicaid and Long-Term Care Planning—a critical resource used by attorneys throughout Oklahoma.
Richard is also a dedicated educator within the legal profession. He has authored and taught Continuing Legal Education (CLE) classes for fellow bar members, sharing his insights on navigating the intricacies of probate and trust management. Beyond the courtroom, he frequently presents to non-profit organizations, professional groups, and the public, helping Oklahomans understand that a verbal promise is no substitute for a legally bulletproof plan.
Whether you are navigating the unique needs of a blended family or protecting assets from the costs of long-term care, Richard uses his recognized experience to ensure your intentions are honored and your family is protected.
Peer Recognized for Professional Excellence
Our commitment to providing clear, honest guidance—treating every client with the same integrity I would show a member of my own family—is reflected in my AV Preeminent® peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
This rating is the highest distinction a lawyer can achieve and is a testament to the fact that my fellow attorneys and members of the judiciary rank my work at the highest level of professional excellence.*
Mandatory Disclaimer
Note on Ratings: AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards. This is not a certification of any specialty.