In estate planning, 'almost' is the same as 'never.' This is the story of a father who promised his family an equal inheritance, but because his bank forms and Will missed the legal target, his step-son was left with nothing. Learn how to avoid the 'Wiley Trap' and ensure your verbal promises actually hold up in an Oklahoma courtroom.
"Intent vs. Reality: Wiley’s story is a classic example of the 'Blended Family Trap.' He had the right goals, but because his bank forms and Will were not legally synchronized, every attempt to protect his family missed the mark. In Oklahoma, the court cannot fix a plan that misses the target."
In Oklahoma, the difference between “family in your heart” and “family in the law” can be devastating. A real-world case involving a father named Wiley shows exactly what happens when a “DIY” plan meets the rigid reality of Oklahoma statutes.
Wiley had three biological children—Curtis, Pam, and Janet—and a step-son, Jeffrey. Throughout his life, Wiley told his kids he wanted his assets divided equally. Some thought that this meant Jeffrey too. However, his legal paperwork told a much more complicated and contradictory story.
After Wiley passed away, a document was found that he had signed. In this document, Wiley explicitly identified Jeffrey as his step-son and stated that Jeffrey should receive only $100, while the other children shared the rest.
The Problem: This document did not meet the strict legal requirements for a valid Will in Oklahoma. Because it wasn’t properly witnessed and didn’t qualify as a handwritten (holographic) Will, the court had to ignore it entirely.
Because the “Will” failed, the estate fell into Intestacy (the state’s default plan). This created a major legal hurdle for Jeffrey:
Jeffrey sued, hoping the court would honor his father’s verbal promises of an equal split. But the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals ruled against him for two reasons:
At Winblad Law, we see these tragedies often. If you have a blended family, you cannot rely on “the state plan” or “conversations” to protect your children.
A common misconception in Oklahoma is that a “Deathbed Wish” or a verbal instruction to family members can function as a Will. Legally, this is known as a nuncupative will, and in Oklahoma, it is almost never valid for modern estate planning.
To even be considered, a verbal will has strict limitations: the estate must be worth less than $1,000, it must be proved by two witnesses, and the person must have been in actual military service in the field or in fear of immediate death from an injury received that same day. In other words, the possibility of a verbal Will in Oklahoma is next to zero. For families like Wiley’s, a verbal promise to “divide things equally” has zero legal standing in probate court.
In the complex world of Oklahoma estate law, details are the difference between a secure legacy and a family legal battle. Richard Winblad brings a concentrated practice in estate planning, probate, and trust law to every client he serves, ensuring that their “darts” hit the bullseye.
As an active member of the Oklahoma Bar Association’s Estate Planning, Probate, and Trust Section, Richard stays at the forefront of the statutes that govern how assets transition from one generation to the next. His commitment to legal excellence earned him the “Award of Excellence” for his contributions to the professional handbook for Medicaid and Long-Term Care Planning—a critical resource used by attorneys throughout Oklahoma.
Richard is also a dedicated educator within the legal profession. He has authored and taught Continuing Legal Education (CLE) classes for fellow bar members, sharing his insights on navigating the intricacies of probate and trust management. Beyond the courtroom, he frequently presents to non-profit organizations, professional groups, and the public, helping Oklahomans understand that a verbal promise is no substitute for a legally bulletproof plan.
Whether you are navigating the unique needs of a blended family or protecting assets from the costs of long-term care, Richard uses his recognized experience to ensure your intentions are honored and your family is protected.
Our commitment to providing clear, honest guidance—treating every client with the same integrity I would show a member of my own family—is reflected in my AV Preeminent® peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
This rating is the highest distinction a lawyer can achieve and is a testament to the fact that my fellow attorneys and members of the judiciary rank my work at the highest level of professional excellence.*
Note on Ratings: AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards. This is not a certification of any specialty.
Why are my Oklahoma oil royalties in suspense? If you have inherited mineral rights in…
Garfield County, anchored by Enid, is a powerhouse in the Northern Oklahoma oil and gas…
Ellis County, located on the far western edge of Oklahoma, is a crucial part of…
Roger Mills County, located on the western edge of Oklahoma, sits atop the prolific Anadarko…
Major County is a vital component of the STACK play (Sooner Trend, Anadarko, Canadian, and…
Major County is a vital component of the STACK play, with significant activity in the…
This website uses cookies.